Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

to give you an idea of how i feel about nudity.

imagine how things would be if this was NOT WORK SAFE. because there are tits in it.

it's so ridiculous, the whole thing. and i'd take my shirt off but i think you all know why that would not work, even besides getting myself arrested.

get over the boob people. get. over. the. boob.



( 45 comments — Leave a comment )
Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:46 am (UTC)
Well, the little ridge of muscle down by his hips? That's blatently pornographic that is.

Think of the children.

Er, the popstars.

Er, my willingness to stare longingly...
Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:53 am (UTC)
I don't particularly have a problem with the boob on tv or whatever. In fact, I would like to encourage more of this sort of thing!

I'll never "get over" the boob though. I like them too much.
Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:02 am (UTC)
I like boobs too. However I believe we should not all have a heart attack and talk about it for a whole week when we see one. Hello, most people ate from them for quite some time early on. By "get over it" I mean not have this ridiculous reaction as if our children's minds are being horribly warped when they see one etc.
Re: - eeedge - Feb. 4th, 2004 04:44 am (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:53 am (UTC)
I agree with everything you said, except this: it's so retarded, the whole thing.

Please, please, please try not to use words like retarded to describe a bad situation, event, person, etc. It's a medical condition, period.

Sorry for the rant, I work in the field and am on a personal crusade against retard, that's so retarded, etc.

Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:59 am (UTC)
ok. i won't use it anymore. i'm sorry.
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:00 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - catsaurus - Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:27 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:16 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: - catsaurus - Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:33 pm (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:53 am (UTC)
God. Why am I so attracted to him???
Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:54 am (UTC)
Because you're a reta... er, Dumb.
Re: - judithiscariot - Feb. 3rd, 2004 10:58 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - oontzgrrl - Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:49 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - professorbooty - Feb. 6th, 2004 08:21 am (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:12 am (UTC)
You know what might cure America's fixation? Watching the movie Breast Men over and over. heh. It's a 1997 flick with David Schwimmer in it. Despite this fact, it is an ok movie. A friend of mine rented it cause, well... erm. The obvious reason. (Huhu huhu huhuuh! Boobies!) However, it turned out to be a hollywoodized biography of the men that invented breast implants. They show in gruesome detail the surgical procedure, and at one point, the results of a botched job. By the end of the movie, I turned to my friend and said, "I don't ever want to see another boobie again. Ever."

Fortunately in later years I was cured, but that's another story. ^^
Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:30 am (UTC)
Man, no shit. I hear more about Janet Jackson's .3-second flash of boob than I do about the latest toxin someone mailed to a senator. Don't make sense.
Feb. 6th, 2004 08:22 am (UTC)
Someone mailed Janet Jackson's boob to a senator?
Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:55 am (UTC)
we're a country of repressed freaks.

take, for example, a viewing of the movie "28 days later" where the audience gets a quick glimpse of penis. the whole place breaks out in nervous giggling.
Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:15 pm (UTC)
The penis is a whole other issue! Have you read the True Porn Clerk Stories entry about size issues? This whole bizarre fear/contempt for the penis is something I really don't get. People need to stop freaking out over the penis but I figured I'd talk about just the boob today. :)
Feb. 3rd, 2004 12:00 pm (UTC)
I keep wondering if Europe would even look up from their morning coffee for this kind of thing. Then I wonder why I don't just live in Europe. Then I wonder why my boss' wife is describing in detail the types of snaps used for Ms. Jackson's wardrobe. So many other things that should be done instead of wasting brain cells on someone's chest.
Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:12 pm (UTC)
Heh... more reasons for europeans to have a laugh at our expense...

I always wonder what I'd be like if women had wandered around half naked all my life. And I don't mean just stripper shaped women, I mean all women.
Re: - schpahky - Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:46 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: - lekythen - Feb. 3rd, 2004 04:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: - prakriti - Feb. 5th, 2004 02:03 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - lekythen - Feb. 5th, 2004 05:25 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - prakriti - Feb. 5th, 2004 06:09 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - lekythen - Feb. 5th, 2004 08:40 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - prakriti - Feb. 6th, 2004 02:57 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 6th, 2004 08:52 am (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 12:33 pm (UTC)
Wouldn't that still be considered NOT WORK SAFE? Just for being sexy, that is, not for being considered "nudity" per se?
Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:09 pm (UTC)
Usually I think people use the lingo "not work safe" specifically to refer to things that make a movie R rated or what have you. Nipples, and crotchal area. The picture I chose is a sexed-up poster (mainly because it was the first one I found and I thought it would be amusing to juxtapose the aggressor in our recent little American Marketing Hoohah with the aggressee) but I was trying to bring attention to the fact that women's boobage = NAUGHTY/men's boobage = neutral. No, I wouldn't put a picture like this up in my cube, if that's what you mean. But people would have alot less compunction about pulling it up in a browser window in most workplaces than pulling up a picture of a shirtless woman. Or, that is my perception...
Re: - keryx - Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:56 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 4th, 2004 07:08 am (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 01:29 pm (UTC)
It's just because men are so visually stimulated. It's a much milder form of the same logic that keeps orthodox muslim women so under wrap - "How can a man be expected to control himself?!"
Feb. 3rd, 2004 01:44 pm (UTC)
It's just because men are so visually stimulated.

I don't believe in any biological component to this. I think women and men are equally visually stimulated.

That's just me though.
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:10 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: - professorbooty - Feb. 6th, 2004 08:26 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 6th, 2004 09:05 am (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
Feb. 6th, 2004 08:27 am (UTC)
Are there no sexual associations for the hipbone or the curve of the neck or a bared midriff?
Re: - snidegrrl - Feb. 6th, 2004 09:06 am (UTC) - Expand
Feb. 3rd, 2004 06:44 pm (UTC)
Exactly. :-) -rips hair out in frustration-
Feb. 4th, 2004 11:10 am (UTC)
Conspiracy to take focus away from elections? I think maybe. :)
Feb. 4th, 2004 07:11 pm (UTC)
Hey I've seen you around the antiporn community, and I always like what you have to say, soooooo do you mind if I add you?
Feb. 4th, 2004 07:31 pm (UTC)
Hey, add away! I will add you too. I like the stuff you have to say as well.
( 45 comments — Leave a comment )


keep it dark

Latest Month

February 2009
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner