?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

amusing licence plate of the day:

on a little red corvette heading west on 66 this morning: WIDEN 66

had breakfast at denny's with todd and lou. 2 hours! we could have kept chatting. it was fun.

What is best for reading pleasure:

hardback
5(16.1%)
trade paperback
22(71.0%)
mass market paperback
4(12.9%)

Tags:

Comments

salami_salome
Feb. 14th, 2003 08:20 pm (UTC)
I have to side with the trade paperback crowd, here. I tend to eat while I read, fall asleep over a book and then roll over on it in the night or kick it out of bed, and otherwise heap abuse on my books. So I like something that I can toss around a little, bend back the cover, etc. It has to be flexible, yet not go all wavy when I read it in a bubble bath -- which I do pretty often. Hardbacks are expensive, rigid, unwieldy and too pristine. Mass markets are too flimsy, get cheap ink all over you, rip the moment you look at them, and besides, they make you feel like you are reading a crappy romance novel even if you are reading high literature. I have a couple of Thomas Hardy and D.H. Lawrence mass market paperbacks that I picked up at the thrift store for twenty five cents a piece, and when I read them I always feel a little like I am insulting the author. Trade papers are good. When I abuse them like I do, it is an act of love. I only once hurled a book across the room in a violent act of rage, but that's because it deserved it for being so terrible, and besides, it was only a mass market. Trade papers are almost ideal. I just wish I could buy them laminated.

snidegrrl
Feb. 19th, 2003 02:26 am (UTC)
you know what *really* pisses me off??? when the laminated cover of a trade paperback or paperback textbook CURLS UP and simply will do nothing but curl up. *grrrr*

that is often one drawback of a cheaply made trade paperback.

that said, hardbacks don't bother me nearly as much as they seem to bother other people. golly.
examorata
Feb. 19th, 2003 02:05 pm (UTC)
I enjoy hardbacks, and they're very good for some things, like extremely well-loved books and ones you want to make sure are around for a long time, etc.

What bugs me, for reading purposes and hauling-to-work-to-read-it purposes, are the Really Huge Books in hardback, because they truly do get unwieldy. Especially for portability. Mind you, I collect Stephen King in hardback, but that's because I'm a bit of a freak in that regard. One day when I have a gazillion dollars I will make sure to have all of his in nice hardback heirloom editions AND in trade paperback so I can haul the paperbacks around and not feel fraught with distress if I get a drop of juice on them.